• Applebee, N., Langer, J., & Mullis, I. (1989). Crossroads in American education. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
• Archer, J. (1998). The link to higher scores. Retrieved on 27 February 2000. Available: www.edweek.org/sreports/tc98/ ets-n.htm.
• Baker, E., Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. (1990). The Apple classrooms of tomorrow: 1990 UCLA evaluation study (Report to Apple Computer). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation.
• Barron, L., & Goldman, E. (1994). Technology and education reform: the reality behind the promise. In B. Means (Ed.), Integrating technology with teacher preparation (pp. 81–110). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Beck, L. (1994). Reclaiming educational administration as a caring profession. New York: Teacher College Press. Becker, H. (1991). How computers are used in United States schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(4),
• 385–406.
• Becker, H. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban Right? Revision of paper written for the January, 2000 School Technology Leadership conference of the Council of Chief State School Offi- cers, Washington, DC.
• Becker, H., Ravitz, J., & Wong Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Center for research on information technology. University of Irvine, CA and University of Minnesota.
• Bork, A. (1985). Personal computers for education. New York: Harper & Row. Bracey, G. W. (1991). Why can’t they be like we were? Phi Delta Kappan, 104–117.
• Brand, G. A. (1998). What research says: training teachers for using technology. Retrieved on 10 June 1998. Available: http://www.nsdc.org/library/jed/jsdw98brand.html.
• Bryk, A., & Thum, Y. (1989). The effect of high school organization on dropping out: an exploratory investigation.
• American Educational Research Journal, 26, 353–383.
• Buchanan, T. T., & Smith, R. M. (1998). Restructuring courses in higher education to model constructivist practice.
• Action on Teacher Education, 20(3), 62–72.
• Byrom, E. (1997). Review of the professional literature on the integration of technology into educational programs. Retrieved on 6 March 2000. Available: www.serve.org/technolgy/litreview.html.
• Cohen, V. (1997). Learning styles in a technology-rich environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(4), 338–350.
• Cohen, V. (1999). Looking at the big picture in technology assessment: what questions should we ask? Retrieved on 11 November 1999. Available: http://iccel.wfu.edu/publications/journals/jcel/jcel990305/vcohen.htm.
• Comprehensive plan: A guide for growth 1998–2003. Wood County Comprehensive Plan. Center for Governmental Research and Public Service, Bowling Green State University.
• Cuban, L. (1991, September). The secret about U.S. test scores. San Jose Mercury News (pp. C1, C5).
• Dwyer, D. (1994, April). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: what we’ve learned. Retrieved 24 February 2002. Available: http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/edlead/9404/dwyer.html.
• Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. (1990). The evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high- access-to technology classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Association, Boston.
• Dwyer, D., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich class- rooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45–52.
• Dyril, O. E., & Kinnaman, D. E. (1994). Preparing for the integration of emerging technologies. Technology & Learn- ing, 14(9), 92–100.
• Franekel, J., & Wallen, N. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education (3rd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill. Jaber, William (1997). A survey of factors which influence teachers’ use of computer-based technology. Dissertation Vir-
• ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
• Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1989). Kids and computers: A positive vision of the future. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 73–86.
• Lee, J. R., & Johnson, C. (1998). Helping higher education faculty clear instructional technology hurdles. Educational Technology Review, 10, 13–17.
• Means, B. (Ed.). (1994). Technology and education reform: the reality behind the promise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
• Means, B. (1997). Critical Issue: using technology to enhance engaged learning for at-risk students. Retrieved on 21 November 1999. Available: www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/students/atrisk/400.
• Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C., Remz, A., & Zorfass, J. (1993). Using technology to support education reform. (Office of Educational Research and Improvement). Washington, DC: Department of Education (Retrieved on 14 July 2001. Available: www.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/TechReforms).
• Means, B., Chelemer, C., & Knapp, M. (Eds.). (1991). Teaching advanced skills to at-risk students: views from research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
• Means, B., & Olson, K. (1994). Tomorrow’s schools: technology and reform in partnership. In B. Means (Ed.), Tech- nology in educational reform: the reality behind the promise (pp. 191–222). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers. Metz, M. (1988). Some missing elements in the educational reform movement. Educational Administration Quarterly,
• 24(4), 446–460.
• Negroponte, N,. Renick, M., & Cassell, J. (1997). Creating a learning revolution. Retrieved on 24 July 2001. Available: http://education.unesco.org/unesco/educprog/lwf/doc/portfolio/opinion8.htm.
• Ohio SchoolNet (1999). Ohio Department of Education, Columbus, OH.
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
• Ragosta, M. (1983). Computer-assisted instruction and compensatory education: a longitudinal analysis. Machine- Mediated Learning, 1, 97–127.
• Report of the Ohio Schools Technology: Implementation Task Force (1999, March).
• Roderick, M. (1993). The path to dropping out: Evidence for intervention. Westport, Ct: Auburn House.
• Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 76–101.
• Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers: integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Bank Street College of Education.
• Texas Education Agency. (1991). A study of the impact of educational reform on at-risk students in Texas (TEA Pub- lication No. GE1-543-01). Austin, TX: Publications Distribution Office.
• US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on: New tools for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
• US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: making the connection (Report No. OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
• US Department of Education. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. National Center of Education Sta- tistics (1999). The condition of education: 1999. Education statistics quarterly, Vol. 1(3). Government Printing Office.
• Vannatta, R., & O’Bannon, B. (2002). Beginning to put the pieces together: a technology infusion model for teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 112–123.
• Wehlage, G., Rutter, R., Smith, G., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. (1989). Reducing the Risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc..
• Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it computer: the relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Servi